PDA

View Full Version : Reviewers wanted?



anons
07-11-2011, 11:37 PM
Reviews wanted by chance?
Im not staff on any sites and i play alot of games :)

Judge
07-12-2011, 02:58 AM
We may have a spot opening up in a few weeks we will come up with some questions for you and I will send you and email, Pm me if that will be ok with you. But no guarantees!

HR_Reviewer
07-12-2011, 05:36 AM
It's not as easy as it looks. There is a lot more to it than just writing the review. I've been doing it for almost a year now, trust me.

anons
07-12-2011, 08:03 AM
ive been hacking for years :)

HR_Reviewer
07-12-2011, 03:49 PM
That's great, but if you can't use proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling you're setting up more work for others like me. Being a reviewer is part investigative journalism, part writer. If you can take your years of hacking and meld that with great writing, you'll be a force feared across the internet.

anons
07-12-2011, 05:40 PM
That's great, but if you can't use proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling you're setting up more work for others like me. Being a reviewer is part investigative journalism, part writer. If you can take your years of hacking and meld that with great writing, you'll be a force feared across the internet.

If i were to write an actual review that was going to mean something then i would use proper grammer etc.

HR_repinS
07-12-2011, 06:22 PM
at this time, what may or may not give you an edge when one is needed would be for you to write a review for any of the hacks you wish, but make it in the format we use here. Give us a sorta resume to work with.

anons
07-12-2011, 07:04 PM
at this time, what may or may not give you an edge when one is needed would be for you to write a review for any of the hacks you wish, but make it in the format we use here. Give us a sorta resume to work with.

choose from the list below
AA
RH
CH
RK

I have used the hacks at these places quite a few times

HR_repinS
07-12-2011, 07:50 PM
You are more than welcome to choose. The site is here to both do professional reviews of any and all sites and to have reviews by the public submitted. :)

xX_X2i_Xx
07-14-2011, 03:44 AM
If you'd like a more experienced reviewer, let me know sometime. I've been in the hacking scene since 2002 and have seen quite a few sites change, go up, and go down in my time.

HR_Reviewer
07-14-2011, 04:41 AM
Feel free to post your resume with a review of your choice that follows our grading scheme. Include an introduction paragraph along with a paragraph per point.

amerg3
07-14-2011, 03:34 PM
i am meber at alot of sites like x22,ragekings,fpscheats,roothacks,catalyst-hax,deltahacks,illusion hacks,rent a cheat,virtual-advantage,aimjunkies,mombot and alot more for a long time am frendly i do my job

HR_Reviewer
07-14-2011, 03:41 PM
I know who you are amerg3. If you want to try out for the job you have to write us a detailed review based on a hack of your choice. It must include a paragraph per point that we grade for and an introduction paragraph that talks about history, hacks, ect. Your review must include proper spelling, grammar, and punctuation to be considered.

badman01
07-16-2011, 12:50 AM
Sup, guy's..

I have submitted my application. The first in-depth one I've done before.
Fingers crossed:)

HR_Reviewer
07-16-2011, 06:08 PM
replied to your pm.

anons
07-18-2011, 06:40 AM
just posted my review - said it needed to be approved by a moderator
Thanks
-anons

HR_Reviewer
07-18-2011, 04:28 PM
Sorry but that section is for staff members and official reviews only. Moved to CH user experiences.

anons
07-18-2011, 09:15 PM
Thank you :)

badman01
07-19-2011, 09:48 AM
oh maaaaaaaaaaan, i did not make it in. i think my reviews were to in-depth. !!
Still, got offered the snitch/stolle/ job, LMFAO..

Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, no thanks

Note: i dint see project monster in the list eigher..!

HR_Reviewer
07-19-2011, 07:51 PM
You were never denied admission. Whoever gave you that idea?

anons
07-19-2011, 07:52 PM
Rage! lol! eigher???

Admin
07-19-2011, 09:33 PM
do a review of Project monster. we just didn't put up a thread for it cause its been pretty dead. Are there any new games over there being offered?

badman01
07-20-2011, 11:22 AM
is there a place where, 'all cant read these posts'.. I mean, do we/you have a private room.

HR_Reviewer
07-20-2011, 12:51 PM
Of course. Same room we talk shit about you, anons, AbsoluteKaos, and others hahahaha! kidding. yes there is a staff section.

anons
07-20-2011, 05:22 PM
lol, the 3 people who have posted on the forum

HR_Reviewer
07-20-2011, 05:39 PM
everyone else is lurking..too skerd to post.

truestory
11-19-2011, 07:41 AM
I'm also interested in writing reviews for your site. I've written two so far, and plan on writing more as I test out more hacks. It was 2:30am when I wrote them, so they might not be 100% with punctuation, but that would change if I did them at a normal hour. I've also been in the cheating scene since counterstrike 1.3 circa 2001-2002. I remember the first hack I used was XQZ2, and also remember the first public OGC release lol.

Admin
11-20-2011, 12:44 AM
You can submit game reviews or personal site experiences but to be a HR reviewer you have to demonstrate no bias in your reviews and your two experiences appear biased. Especially the E-A post.

Show us you can review games and we will take you under consideration.

truestory
11-22-2011, 03:42 AM
You can submit game reviews or personal site experiences but to be a HR reviewer you have to demonstrate no bias in your reviews and your two experiences appear biased. Especially the E-A post.

Show us you can review games and we will take you under consideration.

Once again, I posted my EXPERIENCE, in the user experiences part of the forum. Everything I said was honest and true, and I've said just as many good things as I said bad. It seems that you're the one with bias, and maybe have some sort of deal with EA. Maybe they bought ad space or donated or maybe you are friends with some of them, who knows. Its a well known fact that their community sucks. I applauded their great hacks when they are working and relativity low detection rates. I also mad note of their extremely long downtimes. Still don't see what makes me a "fanboy".

Admin
11-22-2011, 06:45 PM
As a member contributor you are more than welcome to post your experiences and it is always welcome. But a balance has to be struck between a review of a site and a fanboy post. Your posts danced on the line of that. 80% of you review is quality and personally objective material and the other 20% was fanboy. To be a staff writer here it has to be 100% objective.

If you posted as a member contributor and it was anymore fanboy than what it was it never would have seen the light of day here. This is not an indictment on your post it is just that in the past staff from other sites have come in here posing as a nobody posting rave reviews of the site and had intimate information about the site.


These are the red flags of a fan boy post FYI. In your post.


"They dive into the dark depths of VAC and really take it apart piece by piece, to fully take advantage of any bypassing capabilities. With VACcine on the way, (an apparent complete VAC bypass to make cheats basically 100% undetectable) it looks like there are some exciting things on the horizon at EA. "


"They go above and beyond to add even the most obscure feature to a hack. Even though it takes awhile for them to come out with hacks for new games, when they do release them they are 100% worth every penny. I'd say give them a shot."

That my friend is fanboy......As just a member there how do you know exactly what they do with VAC there?


MiniG tried selling us he was just a member at catalyst also. Under a different name here.

truestory
11-22-2011, 07:13 PM
As a member contributor you are more than welcome to post your experiences and it is always welcome. But a balance has to be struck between a review of a site and a fanboy post. Your posts danced on the line of that. 80% of you review is quality and personally objective material and the other 20% was fanboy. To be a staff writer here it has to be 100% objective.

If you posted as a member contributor and it was anymore fanboy than what it was it never would have seen the light of day here. This is not an indictment on your post it is just that in the past staff from other sites have come in here posing as a nobody posting rave reviews of the site and had intimate information about the site.


These are the red flags of a fan boy post FYI. In your post.


"They dive into the dark depths of VAC and really take it apart piece by piece, to fully take advantage of any bypassing capabilities. With VACcine on the way, (an apparent complete VAC bypass to make cheats basically 100% undetectable) it looks like there are some exciting things on the horizon at EA. "


"They go above and beyond to add even the most obscure feature to a hack. Even though it takes awhile for them to come out with hacks for new games, when they do release them they are 100% worth every penny. I'd say give them a shot."

That my friend is fanboy......



Yet again I am stating FACTS about what they do, and completely leave it up to the potential buyer. Why would I leave something like them implementing obscure features out, when its the truth? You seem to have the definition of fanboy skewed. If I came out and immediately said "EA is the best cheating site hands down period", then your argument would hold much more merit. They make it a hobby to break VAC down and find ways to completely bypass it, instead of just coding hacks to get around it until the next ban wave. I personally don't know any other site that goes that deep into things, so that obviously is a major selling point and it definitely should be noted. Also in my experience, their hacks have shown the test of time and are quality, which was also stated. I understand where you're coming from as my post was more of MY experiences then an actual "review", but I've kept everything 100% factual and honest. If any hacking site is putting out cutting edge new features and have quality cheats, then IMO they deserve to be praised for it, as long as you add the bad with the good. Lets face it they all come with downsides.

truestory
11-22-2011, 10:09 PM
As a member contributor you are more than welcome to post your experiences and it is always welcome. But a balance has to be struck between a review of a site and a fanboy post. Your posts danced on the line of that. 80% of you review is quality and personally objective material and the other 20% was fanboy. To be a staff writer here it has to be 100% objective.

If you posted as a member contributor and it was anymore fanboy than what it was it never would have seen the light of day here. This is not an indictment on your post it is just that in the past staff from other sites have come in here posing as a nobody posting rave reviews of the site and had intimate information about the site.


These are the red flags of a fan boy post FYI. In your post.


"They dive into the dark depths of VAC and really take it apart piece by piece, to fully take advantage of any bypassing capabilities. With VACcine on the way, (an apparent complete VAC bypass to make cheats basically 100% undetectable) it looks like there are some exciting things on the horizon at EA. "


"They go above and beyond to add even the most obscure feature to a hack. Even though it takes awhile for them to come out with hacks for new games, when they do release them they are 100% worth every penny. I'd say give them a shot."

That my friend is fanboy......As just a member there how do you know exactly what they do with VAC there?


MiniG tried selling us he was just a member at catalyst also. Under a different name here.



Also, I forgot to address that they have a 15 page "progress thread" where the owner himself writes what they are doing regarding VAC and also gives in detail on a daily basis the progress of everything. Thats how I know what they do with VAC. I'd be glad to contact you with my member info if you have doubts that I'm just a regular member there.

Admin
11-22-2011, 10:38 PM
I will give you the lattitude on this subject. But understand that giving VAC a play by play of what their doing is not a real brilliant move IMO. But none the less its good from a PR standpoint.

And to clear the air....What they are doing is not groundbreaking. I has been implemented by other "top tier" sites well over a year ago. Their just catching up to the pack. The info is public on UC forums. Just some sites accomplish it differently. Thats why Sobeit is there.

truestory
11-23-2011, 12:19 AM
I will give you the lattitude on this subject. But understand that giving VAC a play by play of what their doing is not a real brilliant move IMO. But none the less its good from a PR standpoint.

And to clear the air....What they are doing is not groundbreaking. I has been implemented by other "top tier" sites well over a year ago. Their just catching up to the pack. The info is public on UC forums. Just some sites accomplish it differently. Thats why Sobeit is there.

I probably worded that wrong. Its not that they paste their coding for all to see, or give away anything that could compromise their work, but they keep you in the loop by being detailed enough without giving what they are doing away so to speak. Their downtimes are ridiculous though, and they have their fair share of problems they need to work out. I also didn't know other sites had something like "VACcine" already implemented, thats my bad. Anyway, would you mind doing me a favor and PM me your top 3 "top-tier" sites you personally think are the best out now? Weather its because of low detection rates and or very well coded hacks. You know the top 3 sites you'd recommend to someone who asks you where they should buy hacks from. I just want to branch out more and try more hacks for myself. Thanks in advance.

Admin
11-23-2011, 12:48 AM
I cannot do that. It would show bias on my part and im here to make sure there is no bias here. And NO DRAMA! This site has had a long history of drama and antics not accepted by many sites. Im here to change the formula and the behavior of the members here.

Im making this a news and information site not a drama fest and fanboy site as it was in the past. Thats why my careful parsing of your posts. Ive seen it all here.

I am going to close this thread and open a new one for people to apply for a reviewer position on staff. Anyone can post in the respective cheat sites user experiences area their experiences. But to become a staff member here any posts made by a staff member has to be unbiased in all ways. I will watch the quality and style of the reviews you do in the future and if they get to the level im looking for you will be asked to be on staff. A good place to hone your skills is reviewing games.